The rest of the Mass was the Tower of Babel on display. I love Latin rhythms -- at a party. I like spirituals -- at a prayer service or concert. To me, this kind of service (typical of what we get in my diocese) is the opposite of what happened at Pentecost. Then, the disciples spoke one language and all listeners could understand, regardless of their country of origin. Here, these 21st century disciples spoke a hodge podge of languages, which pointedly excluded large segments of those listening. Perhaps the missalettes had translations, but EWTN did not. I wonder if any of the other broadcast outlets provided translations. Far from being "inclusive" I found the exercise what I always find it, an in-your-face display of difference, not unity. Instead of being one, we come across as being many. And we make no effort to be understood by our brothers and sisters in the faith. This, to me, is confusion and inimical to the joint worship in which we are supposed to be engaged.
I suppose there are those (sadly, I think, too many), who revel in this display of diversity, which would be fine at a prayer service. But I believe it does a disservice to the faith to impose such multiculturalism on the celebration of the Eucharist. It draws attention to the United Nations of Benetton instead of to the Lord Jesus Christ.





Max Rossi/Reuters




